Thursday, January 22, 2015

Letter to the Editor of the Daily Telegraph by Sybil Diccion from Morenci about the Keystone XL Pipeline

Opposing Keystone for the environment
To the editor,
The Bloomberg View editorial in Wednesday’s Telegram is advocating that Obama “OK the Keystone pipeline,” even though the Bloomberg writers admit that “Keystone will not create many jobs for the U.S., and its delivery of 830,000 barrels a day won’t keep the price of gasoline low.” Although I disagree with the initial premise, I was most pleased to read their confirmation that Keystone will NOT create many jobs nor lower our gasoline prices; both statistics being touted by proponents as the reasons Keystone SHOULD be approved. Neither are true and neither are my reasons for objection. My honest concerns deal with the environment.
I, as an aging senior, will probably never have to deal with the problems that are sure to occur should these types of projects be allowed to flourish. But it is what we are leaving our children and grandchildren to deal with that is so troubling.
Tar sands oil is a different animal from what we would recognize as petroleum. It’s a tarry, asphalt-like substance that contains more toxic elements such as arsenic, benzene, lead, mercury and toluene. It would be promising if Trans-Canada could guarantee that spills or leaks would never occur, but Phase I, alone, of the pipeline project spilled 12 times in the U.S. in its first year of operation, and Enbridge, another pipeline operator, suffered a spill of more than one million gallons in the Kalamazoo River in 2010. That cleanup has cost more than $1.2 billion and is still underway. To add insult to injury, none of the companies transporting heavy tar sands crude are required to pay into the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, which pays for the costs of cleaning up a spill and ensures that taxpayers are not footing the bill.
Although only TC knows the exact route of the pipeline, it's certain that in addition to crossing some of the most important farm and ranch lands in the country, it would also cross one of the most vital freshwater sources in the nation, the Ogallala aquifer. The inability of pipeline alarm systems to quickly recognize a leak and alert pipeline operators makes every leak a potential if not actual disaster. “Industry leak detection systems missed 19 of 20 spills,” says NRDC's Anthony Swift. “And what's more concerning is, if you look at the data over the last 10 years, four out of five spills have been greater than 40,000 gallons.” Public Citizen reports dozens of problems with photos as proof of dents and poorly-welded seams in segments of KXL pipeline already laid in southern Texas. One whistleblower was fired for insisting that there be an investigation of the pipelines. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/whistleblower-forced-investigation-of-transcanada-pipelines-1.1146204
Even if I could be convinced that carbon emissions would not be increased, I still would object to the construction of the Keystone. I applaud any decisions made that would benefit the lives of those younger than I, but I do not believe that this pipeline is one of those beneficial decisions.
Sybil Diccion
Morenci

Tuesday, January 6, 2015

Officials worry about pipelines and the St. Clair River


According to the National Pipeline Mapping System, at least 13 transmission pipelines from nine companies are under the St. Clair River.



Officials worry about pipelines and the St. Clair River

More than four years have passed since a ruptured pipeline spilled an estimated 20,000 barrels of crude oil near Marshall.
The spill from Enbridge Energy's Line 6B spread for miles down Talmadge Creek and the Kalamazoo River and launched a four-year cleanup effort.

While state and federal officials say they have systems in place to respond to a similar spill on the St. Clair River, the people on the ground here in St. Clair County aren't as confident.

"I hope it never happens," said Jeff Friedland, director for St. Clair County Emergency Management/Homeland Security. "But I do have concerns about the St. Clair River and pipelines."

With an 830-mile interstate natural gas pipeline [Rover is roughly 830 miles long] threatening to further snarl the maze of natural gas and hazardous liquid pipelines beneath the county, pipeline safety and planning for a spill are responsibilities shared by private companies and public entities at the local, state and federal levels.

"We've had some real-world experience with the Kalamazoo River, and there were some really good lessons learned from that," said Brad Wurfel, a spokesman for the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality.
"You can't expect companies or industrial processes to run perfectly. You can expect that you're prepared when they don't."

Pipeline tally
Marysville Department of Public Safety Chief Tom Konik estimated about 24 transmission pipelines are beneath Marysville.

Those pipelines carry natural gas, propane and chemicals for industrial use.

He said the city has become a bottleneck for pipelines, likely because of its location.

"It's probably because of our proximity to Chemical Valley (in Ontario), where a lot of the products are coming into and out of," Konik said.

"The river is at one of its narrowest points here. When you have to do a drilling operation to put pipeline under the river, it seems like the most ideal spot."

Judy Palnau, spokeswoman for the Michigan Public Service Commission, said currently there are 14 companies operating pipelines in St. Clair County. Eight of the companies are natural gas transmission pipeline operators, and six are hazardous liquid pipeline operators.

She said each of those companies has varying numbers of pipelines through the county.

According to the National Pipeline Mapping System, at least 13 transmission pipelines from nine companies are under the St. Clair River.

Enbridge Energy has three pipelines -- one of which is deactivated -- that run under the St. Clair River. Semco Energy Gas Company has seven transmission lines in St. Clair County, none of which cross the St. Clair River. TransCanada has four pipelines, all of which tunnel under the river. Buckeye Development and Logistics LLC, has two pipelines that travel under the St. Clair River — one is idle, while the other carries propane.

Another pipeline project — the Rover pipeline — also would tunnel under the river. The proposed pipeline has not yet submitted its application to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

Vector Pipeline also is planning an expansion, but has not submitted applications to FERC yet.

General maps of where the existing pipelines are located are available to the public, but more precise information is off limits, according to Damon Hill, spokesman for the federal Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
"After 9/11 we worked with the Department of Homeland Security where we were required to restrict the level of detail on our maps," Hill said. "The only way to get more detail is if you're government personnel or a pipeline operator."

St. Clair County is pipeline country
The promise of at least two new pipeline projects on the heels of a large Enbridge Energy pipeline replacement marks an increase noted throughout the country.

"There has been an increase in pipeline projects in certain parts of the country with the increase in energy resources being found, like shale gas," Hill said.

"There are new pipelines coming into existence to bring that product throughout the country."

Jennifer Smith, a spokeswoman for Enbridge Energy, said the company embarked on its replacement of its more than 50-year-old Line 6B after the spill into the Kalamazoo River called into question the reliability of the pipeline.

She said the company expanded the scope of the project to include counties farther east because of requests from clients for increased capacity.

"Our customers came to us and they said they needed us to be able to carry more crude oil," Smith said.
She said the pipeline runs through St. Clair County because of demand for oil in the area.
"Where your pipeline is is going to be determined by where the demand is," Smith said.
"Back in the day when these pipelines were built, the need was to bring oil further east. You're going to see crude oil pipelines where you have big refineries or chemical hubs."
DTE Energy is a partner in a planned 47-mile Vector Pipeline expansion project and a planned 250-mile NEXUS pipeline project. Both projects are natural gas lines.

Tuesday, December 30, 2014

World-Wide Flight Traffic and Global Climate Change

Globally, about 8.3 million people fly daily (3 billion occupied seats per year), twice the total in 1999.  U.S. airlines alone burned about 16.2 billion gallons of fuel during the twelve months between October 2013 and September 2014. (Wikipedia)

Source: openi.nlm.nih.gov


World-wide now, December 30 2014 11:35 ET

AirTraffic Worldwide over 24h

US air traffic, now December 30 2014, 11:35 ET

 A Day in the Life of Air Traffic Over the United States

Even centered on Adrian, there are about 120 commercial air craft in the air at every given moment during the day!

Monday, December 29, 2014

The Reality of Having a 30-inch Pipeline Construction Site in your Backyard


An environmentally concerned citizen of Oceola Township sent me some videos that he shot while having a large pipeline construction in his backyard. These videos give a good idea what everybody whose property is located along the ET Rover track can expect when their land is taken away from them by "eminent domain".

Wednesday, December 17, 2014

New Pipeline between the Central processing Facility on Witt Farm and Various Wells on Frye Farm

For more than 2 weeks horizontal drilling under M52 and under Beaver Creek goes on to connect the central processing facility on Witt Farm with several wells on Frye Farm West of the Kiwanis Trail. As the central processing plant is only permitted for 10 wells and there were already 9 wells hooked up through the 3 present pipelines it is doubtful that all this is done to just add a single well on the old Frye Farm land. I will forward this question to Kristie Shimko.

News from Kristie Shimko - DEQ:  "Savoy Energy has bored a 6-inch poly disposal line under road and creek crossings between the Adrian 25 Facility (Witt Farm) to the Warner 22 Facility (off Tipton Hwy, North of Hunt Road).  This is an upgrade from their existing 3-inch poly disposal line. This is for salt water/brine disposal only."

Another Wave of Mass Postings to FERC Through Unions in WV, OH and PA

On December 5th, I reported about the abuse of the FERC e-filing system by people filing from WV. It turns out that the local unions in these economically depressed regions handed out sheets and asked the meeting attendees to write down what positive effects they anticipate (or rather hope and pray for) of the pipeline for their local economies. What is wrong with this? Several things, first of all wishful thinking is not reality - it is highly immoral of unions to misinform their members about the real number of jobs created and the real benefits for the local economy. Second, all of the arguments are purely economical arguments and have nothing to do with the environmental impact of the pipeline - which is the only concern of FERC in this process. Finally, as the pipeline will not run through West-Virginia, residents of WV should not have a say about it at all. In addition, flooding the system with these generic "prayer-sheets" is annoying for everybody, who subscribed the ET Rover process and waters down the legitimate input of farmers and residents, as well as townships and counties objecting the pipeline due to its environmental impact! I finally had to unsubscribe as the same union repeated its bad practice this evening again. Latest news - now also unions from Ohio started these mass postings. I attach a few examples with names and addresses removed below. There are literally hundreds of such postings there now - NONE say anything about the environment!