My Request to Monitor the Flare on Witt Farm

After finding out how far the gas and volatile pollution of flares reach, I asked the City of Adrian (in person of its new mayor Jim Berryman), the Lenawee County Health Department in person of Patsy Bourgeois and Martha Hall, and by contacting the DEQ in person of Kristine Shimko and Louis Schineman, what they are going to do about it:

November 27, 2013
Dear Jim, Patricia, and Kristine,

Please let us get together to figure out a way to monitor the health risks posed by the massive flare on Witt Farm that is still going strong. Please consult my latest blog post at:

http://adrianoil.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-flare-on-witt-farm.html
http://adrianoil.blogspot.com/2013/11/witt-farm-update.html

and the attached annotated risk assessment by the internationally known Canadian scientist James Argo.

Feel free to consult with me any time - I am looking forward to a meeting!

Sincerely, Tom
---------------------------------------
Thomas Wassmer, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Biology
Siena Heights University
1247 E. Siena Heights Dr.
Adrian, MI 49221
517-264-7637


As expected, one institution looks at the other for being responsible and in charge of doing something. From the city I only have a statement of intention by mayor Jim Berryman that the city should do something, the County Heath Department asked the DEQ if they could monitor the flare, and they denied this request. I therefore wrote the below letter to the County Heath Department today. In copy to: Mayor Jim Berryman, the City of Adrian Comissioners, and John Mulcahy from the Daily Telegram

January 7, 2014
Martha and Pat,

That was expected as they ignore the risk - and do not have jurisdiction - nor the money to force prudent and well needed safety, health and environmental risk monitoring on the industry. Now the question is, will the county and the city also ignore what should be done to safeguard the citizens of Adrian, Adrian Township and Raisin Township?

Tom
---------------------------------------
Thomas Wassmer, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Biology
Siena Heights University
1247 E. Siena Heights Dr.
Adrian, MI 49221
517-264-7637

The Extend of Flaring in Drilling Operations

Visible even from space, more than 1,500 natural gas flares illuminate the prairie in the Bakken oil field in North Dakota, for lack of gas pipelines. Image credit: Jim Wilson/The New York Times

In the December 17 issue of the NYT, Clifford Krauss writes that flaring in the Bakken field in North Dakota can be seen from space. World-wide flares produce an estimated 400 million tons of carbon dioxide every year, equivalent to the emissions 77 million cars.

The article reports that companies are starting to think that it might be economical to capture the gas and use it to power machineries. In fact so much is flared right now in the Bakken field alone that if all drilling equipment would be powered with the gas instead of expensive diesel fuel, it would only take about a fifth of what is flared. The article praises the economical sound decisions of companies going this way as there are no legal ways to make these booming industries stop flaring. North Dakota allows flaring for the first year of every new well but grants extensions if it is not economically beneficial for companies to capture the gas. The same kind of laws we have in Michigan. One could ask why is the companies' new willingness to do the right thing at least in part the only way to stop this insanity? Why can we not just change these stupid and outdated laws that sell off our land, water and air to the highest bidders that do nothing for the public than harm our health and threaten the survival of our children?

Full article here: Applying Creativity to a Byproduct of Oil Drilling

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/18/business/energy-environment/applying-creativity-to-a-byproduct-of-oil-drilling-in-north-dakota.html

Heritage Park Oil Pump Leak?

For days now the oil pump in Heritage Park smells real bad as if it is leaking.

The Flare on Witt Farm

 

According to the environmental health specialist James Argo, one regular component of flare fumes, benzene "will be present in enough concentration to pose a measurable risk to inhabitants out to 5 km from the flare". I indicate this radius in the below picture:

The flare on Witt Farm and the 5km radius around the flare in which to expect health impacts due to benzene alone. At least 15,000 people live within this circle.

Here are a few other excerpts from a report James Argo wrote for the Canadian environmental group Save Our Seas and Shores (Argo 2001):

• "A flare is a device for disposing of waste gas and oil [and co-produced sea-water] very cheaply by burning the organic material in an open, uncontrolled, manner at an elevation above the ground varying from 15 to 75 or more m.. The elevation is to disperse the combustion products and throw them away from the work site."
• "Flares are an unreported source of greenhouse gases. Flaring emissions do not appear in National Pollutant Release Inventory from Environment Canada nor Toxic Release Inventory in the US."
• "Flares are an unreported source of dioxins."
• "A poorly operating flare is a travesty against the entire biosphere within up to a 30km radius. It is axiomatic that where a flare is smoking no one should be downwind."
• "The result is that an elevated risk for cancer may be present in the first 2.5 to 5 km from the flare. Residents in this zone have the potential to be affected by benzene exposure as described below. This concentration of benzene is below the odor threshold."
• "Increased morbidity and elevated risk of leukemia is everywhere possible for residents within 5 km under these conditions. Those most at risk of long-term health effects are persons under age 30."

 Sources:
 Argo J. UNHEALTHY EFFECTS OF UPSTREAM OIL AND GAS FLARING [Internet]. Sydney, NS, Canada: SAVE OUR SEAS and  SHORES (SOSS). Available from: https://wassmer.org/Adrian/soss-oil-and-gas-flaring.pdf 

Amodio M, de Gennaro G, Marzocca A, Trizio L, Tutino M. Assessment of Impacts Produced by Anthropogenic Sources in a Little City near an Important Industrial Area (Modugno, Southern Italy). The Scientific World Journal [Internet].2013:10. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/150397

Pope Francis: "Thou shalt not frack!"

Pope Francis holding up anti-fracking t-shirts following a meeting with a group of Argentinian environmental activists to discuss water and fracking issues. The shirts read “No To Fracking” and “Water Is More Precious Than Gold.” Meet the Newest Anti-Fracking Activist: Pope Francis. I haven't seen this covered prominently here, but thought it's worth a mention when the guy with a direct line to 1.2 billion people's ears says that it's not cool to frack. This week the Twitterverse went ablaze when Pope Francis met with Argentine filmmaker Fernando “Pino” Solanas (La Guerra del Fracking -- The Fracking War) and environmental activist Juan Pablo Olsson at the Vatican to discuss fracking and water pollution. Olsson posted the photo of himself, Solanas and Pope Francis. Next Up For Pope Francis: Anti-Fracking Activist? Finally, a logical pope. If your belief tells you that God gave us th...- read the full story at: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/11/15/1255844/-Pope-Francis-Thou-shalt-not-frack

Demonstration at Enbridge's Office in Marshall

I received the following announcement by MI-CATS (http://www.michigancats.org/) and thought you would be interested and/or help to get the word out:

We are excited to invite you to a demonstration at Enbridge's office in
Marshall on Monday, November 25th at 11:30 am. Luckily there is no jury
selection that day! Instead we will visit Enbridge officials who hold down
a fort near the worst inland oil spill in the history of histories. We
will demand they properly clean up the spill before continuing with their
project. We will also urge them to abandon all tar sands infrastructure
projects. We invite people to bring signs, noisemakers, glitter and
energy! If you are able to join, reply to micats@riseup.net and we will give you
more specifics- meet up points and the timeline for the day.

Witt Farm Update

As expected, the flare on Witt Farm is very large. You cannot see the flame (as it is hidden in an empty, top open tank - I wonder why?) but as 6 or more wells are now processed on Witt Farm, it is burning very hot, which you can see on the picture below. The smell is awful, even while taking the picture from M52, which is west of the flare - and the wind coming from the south - so it should not smell at all to the west!! Just as a reminder of my previous post: what you can smell might not be the worst of the gas and volatile cocktail that is spewed out by this mega-flare. However, it is a good indication of how much is spewed, which is certainly not healthy for the neighbors within at least a 2 mile radius. Denial will not help them as these are chemicals that are not following the "what does not kill you makes you stronger" fallacy.  In addition, property values in the wider surroundings will go down because of having a dirty industry so close by - regardless of neighboring property owners following the "ostrich principle" (sticking your head in the sand takes care of danger) as in the notion of "what you do not talk about does not exist"...

Burning of the gases and vapors of 6 or more wells in the hidden flare on Witt Farm produces a lot of heat showing the partial combustion of partially poisonous and cancerous chemicals.

There are now 7 or more oil barrels to store crude - meaning that either 7 wells are currently processed, soon to be processed - or that there is so much oil going in through the now 3 pipelines that the previous 6 tanks were not sufficient anymore.

 The six original grey tanks were lately supplemented by 1 or two new beige colored tanks, which would translate to probably 8 wells coming in

On the separator side, there are 6 separators visible when coming down M52 southbound. This would rather suggest 6 wells...