Tuesday, January 6, 2015

Officials worry about pipelines and the St. Clair River


According to the National Pipeline Mapping System, at least 13 transmission pipelines from nine companies are under the St. Clair River.



Officials worry about pipelines and the St. Clair River

More than four years have passed since a ruptured pipeline spilled an estimated 20,000 barrels of crude oil near Marshall.
The spill from Enbridge Energy's Line 6B spread for miles down Talmadge Creek and the Kalamazoo River and launched a four-year cleanup effort.

While state and federal officials say they have systems in place to respond to a similar spill on the St. Clair River, the people on the ground here in St. Clair County aren't as confident.

"I hope it never happens," said Jeff Friedland, director for St. Clair County Emergency Management/Homeland Security. "But I do have concerns about the St. Clair River and pipelines."

With an 830-mile interstate natural gas pipeline [Rover is roughly 830 miles long] threatening to further snarl the maze of natural gas and hazardous liquid pipelines beneath the county, pipeline safety and planning for a spill are responsibilities shared by private companies and public entities at the local, state and federal levels.

"We've had some real-world experience with the Kalamazoo River, and there were some really good lessons learned from that," said Brad Wurfel, a spokesman for the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality.
"You can't expect companies or industrial processes to run perfectly. You can expect that you're prepared when they don't."

Pipeline tally
Marysville Department of Public Safety Chief Tom Konik estimated about 24 transmission pipelines are beneath Marysville.

Those pipelines carry natural gas, propane and chemicals for industrial use.

He said the city has become a bottleneck for pipelines, likely because of its location.

"It's probably because of our proximity to Chemical Valley (in Ontario), where a lot of the products are coming into and out of," Konik said.

"The river is at one of its narrowest points here. When you have to do a drilling operation to put pipeline under the river, it seems like the most ideal spot."

Judy Palnau, spokeswoman for the Michigan Public Service Commission, said currently there are 14 companies operating pipelines in St. Clair County. Eight of the companies are natural gas transmission pipeline operators, and six are hazardous liquid pipeline operators.

She said each of those companies has varying numbers of pipelines through the county.

According to the National Pipeline Mapping System, at least 13 transmission pipelines from nine companies are under the St. Clair River.

Enbridge Energy has three pipelines -- one of which is deactivated -- that run under the St. Clair River. Semco Energy Gas Company has seven transmission lines in St. Clair County, none of which cross the St. Clair River. TransCanada has four pipelines, all of which tunnel under the river. Buckeye Development and Logistics LLC, has two pipelines that travel under the St. Clair River — one is idle, while the other carries propane.

Another pipeline project — the Rover pipeline — also would tunnel under the river. The proposed pipeline has not yet submitted its application to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

Vector Pipeline also is planning an expansion, but has not submitted applications to FERC yet.

General maps of where the existing pipelines are located are available to the public, but more precise information is off limits, according to Damon Hill, spokesman for the federal Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
"After 9/11 we worked with the Department of Homeland Security where we were required to restrict the level of detail on our maps," Hill said. "The only way to get more detail is if you're government personnel or a pipeline operator."

St. Clair County is pipeline country
The promise of at least two new pipeline projects on the heels of a large Enbridge Energy pipeline replacement marks an increase noted throughout the country.

"There has been an increase in pipeline projects in certain parts of the country with the increase in energy resources being found, like shale gas," Hill said.

"There are new pipelines coming into existence to bring that product throughout the country."

Jennifer Smith, a spokeswoman for Enbridge Energy, said the company embarked on its replacement of its more than 50-year-old Line 6B after the spill into the Kalamazoo River called into question the reliability of the pipeline.

She said the company expanded the scope of the project to include counties farther east because of requests from clients for increased capacity.

"Our customers came to us and they said they needed us to be able to carry more crude oil," Smith said.
She said the pipeline runs through St. Clair County because of demand for oil in the area.
"Where your pipeline is is going to be determined by where the demand is," Smith said.
"Back in the day when these pipelines were built, the need was to bring oil further east. You're going to see crude oil pipelines where you have big refineries or chemical hubs."
DTE Energy is a partner in a planned 47-mile Vector Pipeline expansion project and a planned 250-mile NEXUS pipeline project. Both projects are natural gas lines.

Tuesday, December 30, 2014

World-Wide Flight Traffic and Global Climate Change

Globally, about 8.3 million people fly daily (3 billion occupied seats per year), twice the total in 1999.  U.S. airlines alone burned about 16.2 billion gallons of fuel during the twelve months between October 2013 and September 2014. (Wikipedia)

Source: openi.nlm.nih.gov


World-wide now, December 30 2014 11:35 ET

AirTraffic Worldwide over 24h

US air traffic, now December 30 2014, 11:35 ET

 A Day in the Life of Air Traffic Over the United States

Even centered on Adrian, there are about 120 commercial air craft in the air at every given moment during the day!

Monday, December 29, 2014

The Reality of Having a 30-inch Pipeline Construction Site in your Backyard


An environmentally concerned citizen of Oceola Township sent me some videos that he shot while having a large pipeline construction in his backyard. These videos give a good idea what everybody whose property is located along the ET Rover track can expect when their land is taken away from them by "eminent domain".

Wednesday, December 17, 2014

New Pipeline between the Central processing Facility on Witt Farm and Various Wells on Frye Farm

For more than 2 weeks horizontal drilling under M52 and under Beaver Creek goes on to connect the central processing facility on Witt Farm with several wells on Frye Farm West of the Kiwanis Trail. As the central processing plant is only permitted for 10 wells and there were already 9 wells hooked up through the 3 present pipelines it is doubtful that all this is done to just add a single well on the old Frye Farm land. I will forward this question to Kristie Shimko.

News from Kristie Shimko - DEQ:  "Savoy Energy has bored a 6-inch poly disposal line under road and creek crossings between the Adrian 25 Facility (Witt Farm) to the Warner 22 Facility (off Tipton Hwy, North of Hunt Road).  This is an upgrade from their existing 3-inch poly disposal line. This is for salt water/brine disposal only."

Another Wave of Mass Postings to FERC Through Unions in WV, OH and PA

On December 5th, I reported about the abuse of the FERC e-filing system by people filing from WV. It turns out that the local unions in these economically depressed regions handed out sheets and asked the meeting attendees to write down what positive effects they anticipate (or rather hope and pray for) of the pipeline for their local economies. What is wrong with this? Several things, first of all wishful thinking is not reality - it is highly immoral of unions to misinform their members about the real number of jobs created and the real benefits for the local economy. Second, all of the arguments are purely economical arguments and have nothing to do with the environmental impact of the pipeline - which is the only concern of FERC in this process. Finally, as the pipeline will not run through West-Virginia, residents of WV should not have a say about it at all. In addition, flooding the system with these generic "prayer-sheets" is annoying for everybody, who subscribed the ET Rover process and waters down the legitimate input of farmers and residents, as well as townships and counties objecting the pipeline due to its environmental impact! I finally had to unsubscribe as the same union repeated its bad practice this evening again. Latest news - now also unions from Ohio started these mass postings. I attach a few examples with names and addresses removed below. There are literally hundreds of such postings there now - NONE say anything about the environment!






Monday, December 15, 2014

Sad News: Theo Colborn passed away, 1927-2014

One of my modern day heroes, who was both an outstanding scientist and a tireless activist passed away yesterday. Read a short obituary here - with links to more info on "The Rachel Carson of the 80s and 90s", and her fight against endocrine disruptors, chemicals used in oil and gas drilling, and pesticides.

http://endocrinedisruption.org/enews/2014/12/11/theo-colborn-1927-2014/


Friday, December 5, 2014

Complaint addressed to FERC about Generic Mass Comments submitted to FERC PF14-14-000

To whom it may concern,
I am just wondering what the flood of scanned comments of supporters of the project from WV has to do with FERC's approval process.
The pipeline does not travel through WV - therefore these people should not have a say on its approval.
In addition, all of these comments are written very carelessly and are very brief - 3 lines at the most - not even full sentences.
None of the comments mentions a single environmental aspect - it is all is about the supposed benefits for the economy.
I thought this process is about the environmental impact of the project - not about the promised and highly disputable impact on local economies!
It seems to me that somebody thinks if they gather 100 of these generic support letters they can counter objective scientific analyses of the environmental impact of the project, like the one I submitted, which cites 36 recent scientific research publications - or statements from entire townships in Ohio and Michigan opposing the pipeline.
If that is correct, the FERC process is a big farce and serves nothing else than pretending that the environmental impact of the project is seriously investigated!
A copy of this comment is published on my blog: adrianoil.blogspot.com
---------------------------------------
Thomas Wassmer, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Biology
Siena Heights University

________________________________________
From: 'FERC eSubscription' [eSubscription@ferc.gov]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 7:25 PM
Subject: Comment on Filing submitted in FERC PF14-14-000 by INDIVIDUAL
On 12/4/2014, the following Filing was submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), Washington D.C.:

Filer: INDIVIDUAL
Docket(s): PF14-14-000
Lead Applicant: Rover Pipeline LLC
Filing Type: Comment on Filing
Description: Comments of Christopher D. Strait re the ET Rover Pipeline under PF14-14.
To view the document for this Filing, click here
http://elibrary.FERC.gov/idmws/file_list.asp?accession_num=20141204-0028

To modify your subscriptions, click here: https://ferconline.ferc.gov/eSubscription.aspx
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not respond to this email.
Online help is available here:
http://www.ferc.gov/efiling-help.asp
or for phone support, call 866-208-3676.